A Color Story

A Little Bit of Vindication

First of all -- can anyone tell me how it got to be September already?  Man.  I'm scrambling here to figure out where the summer has gone. . .


Now, then.  Last week I made a True Confession.  I think it's time for another one.

Sometimes (actually, more than sometimes) I peek at the end of a book before I get to the end.

Only a few people know about this.  Because -- whenever I happen to mention it (out loud) -- I get horrified reactions sort of like you might expect if I had announced that . . . I kick my dog (I don't) . . . or that I like one of my children more than the other (I don't). . . or that I dig up plants that are still living and throw them in the compost pile (well, ummmm, sometimes I do that). 

It's always been amazing to me that most people think reading must be a linear exercise.

For me, I find that "knowing how it all comes out" actually helps me enjoy a book more.  When I don't know how things end. . . I find myself speeding along to get to the exciting (or even NOT exciting) conclusion.  If I'm fixated on plotline, I tend to ignore. . . dialogue; language; character development.  I don't enjoy the journey . . . if I'm tearing along to the finish line.

But, I've learned to keep this little secret to myself.  (I've met a few others like me -- but, most people think the "right way" to read is linearly.  And they are quite judgmental about those of us who. . . don't.)

Anyway.  While flipping through my copy of The Week magazine yesterday, I discovered this little blurb:

Mysteries without mystery
Have you ever been tempted to flip to the end of a mystery novel? Go ahead: Suspense, a new study has found, is irrelevant to our enjoyment of a story. In fact, say researchers at the University of California at San Diego, most people like stories more if they know in advance how they end—even with plots that hinge on a mystery or a twist. The researchers set up different versions of 12 short stories written by authors such as Agatha Christie, Raymond Carver, and Anton Chekhov. One came with an introduction that spoiled the ending; one had a spoiler embedded in the middle of the text; and a third appeared just as its author had written it. Surprisingly, readers who learned the endings of their stories up front reported liking them much more on a scale of one to 10 than did readers of the other two versions. Why? The pleasure readers get from a good story, researcher Jonathan Leavitt tells BBCNews.com, has far more to do with the quality of the writing and character development than with a nail-biting plot. Once a reader knows how a story turns out, Leavitt says, he or she “can focus on a deeper understanding of the story.”  (From The Week, September 2, 2011; volume 11; page 23)



And speaking of reading . . . my reading has nearly slowed to a crawl this summer.  Why?  Well.  I've been reading this:


I don't know that I've ever had more varied and contradictory responses while reading a book.  Ever.  Oh, it's not for everyone, that's for sure!  A slog . . . in that same way that Tolstoy can be a slog.  But brilliant . . . in that same way that Tolstoy can be brilliant.  In the end, though, I'm going to have to give it 5 stars.  Because it will haunt me for a long time.

But I'm going to need some lighter fare for a while.  Good thing the new Louise Penney "Three Pines mystery" came out this week!  (Maybe I'll read the ending first. . . maybe I won't.  I'll never tell!)